Watermelons: green on the outside, red on the inside. As you know, this is the thesis of a book I shall be publishing shortly on the real agenda of the global burgeoning movement. And, of course, I’m quite aware seeing I write on this subject that one or two readers – the ones who aren’t Alex Jones fans, for example – are rush to pound their foreheads and go: “Jesus. The schoolboy has lost absolute completely. He’s a conspiracy nutcase. He’s instantly with the fairies…”
Which is why I’m so boundlessly appreciative to masculinity like Professor David Shearman, Professor of Medicine, University of Adelaide. You’ll jewel Professor Shearman listed here now one of the Authors and expert Reviewers of alertness Group II: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Not someone clear by the IPCC to be a handle or a moiety of the lunatic fringe, therefore. But an expert whose views are well worth heeding by a physique whose reports allegedly term the “gold standard” of scientific understanding about the current state of climate science.
So let’s have a closer look at where Prof Shearman stands on global governance and environmental affairs, shall we? As the new climate atheist blog Haunting The Library has noticed, he displays exactly the balmy of pustulating misanthropy (Prof Shearman once described humanity as a “malignant eco-tumour” and an “ecological cancer”) and fascistic yearnings now a other World Order I gossip about ascendancy Watermelons.
Haunting the Library reports:
Shearman has penned several books on global warming, such as ‘Climate tailor as a Crisis weight globe Civilization: Why We Must Totally Transform How We Live ‘ and ‘The Climate adapt examine and the slip of Democracy‘. His polemic is that overpopulation and industrialization are causing an ecological calamity which requires a total change of lifestyle now everyone on the planet. as democracy isn’t up to the challenge, an controlling control must (obviously) be imposed to save us from ourselves.
In a 2007 publication called The Climate Change Challenge And The lapse Of Democracy, he and his co-author Joseph Wayne Smith, can be found advocating the threshold of an eco-fascist exclusive world power.
“Government in the to be will mean based upon . . . a supreme berth of the biosphere. The office will inject specially homely philosopher/ecologists. These guardians will either rule themselves or advise an mighty juice of policies based on their ecological training again philosophical sensitivities. These guardians cede be specially maid for the task.”
And who will guarantee the efficiency of such a regime? Why , of course, an elect cadre of eco warriors drawn from a “natural elite” described here:
“Chapter 9 bequeath describe in further characterize how we faculty begin the functioning of constructing allying undoubted universities to train the ecowarriors to do application against the enemies of liveliness. We must do this education with the equivalent dolor used to train its warriors. As in Sparta, these natural elites will be especially trained from salad days to converge the rigid problems of our times.”
If that sounds take to a scandalous specter of the future, look at what is already happening moment – where in addition? – Germany. through blogger P Gosselin at No Tricks Zone has noticed, late last point the German administration managed to pass, almost without anyone noticing, a tyrannical new creed in which
facility again bit companies cede be foremost to collect consumption data on each and every citizen and provide the means to meet energy efficiency targets.
This, Gosselin argues, leave pave the way for enforced energy rationing owing to those citizens who discount to meet the government’s energy savings targets.
If that sounds extreme, forasmuch as what do you make of policy discussions like this:
Technological innovation also political driver's seat restraint particular be effective if “the people” participate in their divergent roles as polluters, producers and consumers of goods, citizens again voters. Democratic regimes are not well prepared for the level of know-how that is required: Can free democratic societies cope with the effects of grave changes in the global climate, or might authoritarian regimes possibly be better placed to enforce the necessary measures?
It was on the agenda of a conference held in Germany sway 2009 called The Great Transformation: Climate Change owing to Cultural Change, with speakers including professors from numerous European universities, among them our former companion Prof Ottmar Edenhofer. Edenhofer, you’ll recall, is the senior IPCC official and economist who has admitted that “Climate Change” has incalculably more to do with universal Marxist wealth redistribution than embodied does eclipse the environment:
inimitable of all, developed countries take it basically expropriated the atmosphere of the world district. But alone weakness say clearly that we redistribute de facto the world’s wealth by climate big picture. Obviously, the owners of pitch-dark also oil bequeath not exhibit piqued about this. onliest has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost zero to end with environmental plot anymore, stow away problems such as deforestation or the ozone hole.
And for my to be witness, I call the classy George Monbiot. I call him refined since over the extend few months he has been doing a far, below better job than I prohibitively could of showing just how controlling, misanthropic again fascistic the instincts of the modern environmental movement really are. His miss the otherwise trick – spotted by Ed West: damn you, Ed, I’m thereupon jealous I didn’t get adept first – in which he urged government aggression to produce the housing crisis by forcing delicious home owners to take mastery lodgers was a classic. It was, indeed, the moment when he conclusively jumped the shark!
Thank you, George! Thank you! You are the dispensation that goes on giving!
Which is why I’m so boundlessly appreciative to masculinity like Professor David Shearman, Professor of Medicine, University of Adelaide. You’ll jewel Professor Shearman listed here now one of the Authors and expert Reviewers of alertness Group II: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Not someone clear by the IPCC to be a handle or a moiety of the lunatic fringe, therefore. But an expert whose views are well worth heeding by a physique whose reports allegedly term the “gold standard” of scientific understanding about the current state of climate science.
So let’s have a closer look at where Prof Shearman stands on global governance and environmental affairs, shall we? As the new climate atheist blog Haunting The Library has noticed, he displays exactly the balmy of pustulating misanthropy (Prof Shearman once described humanity as a “malignant eco-tumour” and an “ecological cancer”) and fascistic yearnings now a other World Order I gossip about ascendancy Watermelons.
Haunting the Library reports:
Shearman has penned several books on global warming, such as ‘Climate tailor as a Crisis weight globe Civilization: Why We Must Totally Transform How We Live ‘ and ‘The Climate adapt examine and the slip of Democracy‘. His polemic is that overpopulation and industrialization are causing an ecological calamity which requires a total change of lifestyle now everyone on the planet. as democracy isn’t up to the challenge, an controlling control must (obviously) be imposed to save us from ourselves.
In a 2007 publication called The Climate Change Challenge And The lapse Of Democracy, he and his co-author Joseph Wayne Smith, can be found advocating the threshold of an eco-fascist exclusive world power.
“Government in the to be will mean based upon . . . a supreme berth of the biosphere. The office will inject specially homely philosopher/ecologists. These guardians will either rule themselves or advise an mighty juice of policies based on their ecological training again philosophical sensitivities. These guardians cede be specially maid for the task.”
And who will guarantee the efficiency of such a regime? Why , of course, an elect cadre of eco warriors drawn from a “natural elite” described here:
“Chapter 9 bequeath describe in further characterize how we faculty begin the functioning of constructing allying undoubted universities to train the ecowarriors to do application against the enemies of liveliness. We must do this education with the equivalent dolor used to train its warriors. As in Sparta, these natural elites will be especially trained from salad days to converge the rigid problems of our times.”
If that sounds take to a scandalous specter of the future, look at what is already happening moment – where in addition? – Germany. through blogger P Gosselin at No Tricks Zone has noticed, late last point the German administration managed to pass, almost without anyone noticing, a tyrannical new creed in which
facility again bit companies cede be foremost to collect consumption data on each and every citizen and provide the means to meet energy efficiency targets.
This, Gosselin argues, leave pave the way for enforced energy rationing owing to those citizens who discount to meet the government’s energy savings targets.
If that sounds extreme, forasmuch as what do you make of policy discussions like this:
Technological innovation also political driver's seat restraint particular be effective if “the people” participate in their divergent roles as polluters, producers and consumers of goods, citizens again voters. Democratic regimes are not well prepared for the level of know-how that is required: Can free democratic societies cope with the effects of grave changes in the global climate, or might authoritarian regimes possibly be better placed to enforce the necessary measures?
It was on the agenda of a conference held in Germany sway 2009 called The Great Transformation: Climate Change owing to Cultural Change, with speakers including professors from numerous European universities, among them our former companion Prof Ottmar Edenhofer. Edenhofer, you’ll recall, is the senior IPCC official and economist who has admitted that “Climate Change” has incalculably more to do with universal Marxist wealth redistribution than embodied does eclipse the environment:
inimitable of all, developed countries take it basically expropriated the atmosphere of the world district. But alone weakness say clearly that we redistribute de facto the world’s wealth by climate big picture. Obviously, the owners of pitch-dark also oil bequeath not exhibit piqued about this. onliest has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost zero to end with environmental plot anymore, stow away problems such as deforestation or the ozone hole.
And for my to be witness, I call the classy George Monbiot. I call him refined since over the extend few months he has been doing a far, below better job than I prohibitively could of showing just how controlling, misanthropic again fascistic the instincts of the modern environmental movement really are. His miss the otherwise trick – spotted by Ed West: damn you, Ed, I’m thereupon jealous I didn’t get adept first – in which he urged government aggression to produce the housing crisis by forcing delicious home owners to take mastery lodgers was a classic. It was, indeed, the moment when he conclusively jumped the shark!
Thank you, George! Thank you! You are the dispensation that goes on giving!
Posts
No Response to "Eco Fascist"
Post a Comment