Okay, as that this year's Baseball Hall of Fame class has been selected, it's time to debate the whole question: Which bonnet should the new inductees appear as shown exhausting on their plaques?
It's trickier examine than usual, because this year's inductees both played since a large number of teams. Let's transact a look:
Inductee No. 1: Roberto Alomar
Played for: Padres, Blue Jays, Orioles, Indians, Mets, White Sox, Diamondbacks
Factors to consider: Never played more than five years lock up any team, thus it's bothersome to tie him to unequaled franchise. Arguably had his premium seasons in Baltimore (1996) also Cleveland (1999, 2001), but he also had a very desired run in Toronto, where he won two world series rings.
Bottom line: by much fans accepted think of Alomar as a dispirited Jay. The two championships he won with them leave likely lead the Hall to plant him in a Jays cap.
Inductee No. 2: Bert Blyleven
Played for: Twins (two different stints), Rangers, Pirates, Indians, Angels
Factors to consider: Spent about half of his 22-year career secrete Minnesota, wherefore the Twins cap is a fairly easy call here. But which Twins cap should de facto be -- the "TC" cap from early spell his biz or the "M" cap from his second go-round imprint Minnesota?
Bottom line: since also York Times writer Tyler Kepner has argued, this might substitute a situation of a facial hair tiebreaker, seeing most of us now think of Blyleven with his trademark beard, which he hadn't yet grown during his first faculty with the Twins. So plane thought the "TC" hat is the additional attractive option, the beard tips the scales toward the "M" cap.
What do you think? Has the unitary Hall of Fame trilby concern gotten outermost of assistance? Should players just perform shown obscured a cap, or without a cap logo? Leave a comment to hire us learn what you think.
It's trickier examine than usual, because this year's inductees both played since a large number of teams. Let's transact a look:
Inductee No. 1: Roberto Alomar
Played for: Padres, Blue Jays, Orioles, Indians, Mets, White Sox, Diamondbacks
Factors to consider: Never played more than five years lock up any team, thus it's bothersome to tie him to unequaled franchise. Arguably had his premium seasons in Baltimore (1996) also Cleveland (1999, 2001), but he also had a very desired run in Toronto, where he won two world series rings.
Bottom line: by much fans accepted think of Alomar as a dispirited Jay. The two championships he won with them leave likely lead the Hall to plant him in a Jays cap.
Inductee No. 2: Bert Blyleven
Played for: Twins (two different stints), Rangers, Pirates, Indians, Angels
Factors to consider: Spent about half of his 22-year career secrete Minnesota, wherefore the Twins cap is a fairly easy call here. But which Twins cap should de facto be -- the "TC" cap from early spell his biz or the "M" cap from his second go-round imprint Minnesota?
Bottom line: since also York Times writer Tyler Kepner has argued, this might substitute a situation of a facial hair tiebreaker, seeing most of us now think of Blyleven with his trademark beard, which he hadn't yet grown during his first faculty with the Twins. So plane thought the "TC" hat is the additional attractive option, the beard tips the scales toward the "M" cap.
What do you think? Has the unitary Hall of Fame trilby concern gotten outermost of assistance? Should players just perform shown obscured a cap, or without a cap logo? Leave a comment to hire us learn what you think.
Posts
No Response to "Baseball Hall of Fame"
Post a Comment