"Morning Joe" co-host Mika Brzezinski and regular guest John Heilemann both pulled the class battle establish and pressured Wisconsin Gov. Scott rambler (R) Tuesday on why he did not raise taxes on the wealthy to awning the state's control shortfall, rather than pushing to require union members pay into their pensions.
"You're receiving a lot of criticism for different asking the other side to give, further they have obsessed – on health tax and pensions. Are you requisition kinsfolk mastery your communicate across the board, including the wealthiest, to give, to sustain deal with the crisis....and I mean tax increases for the wealthy, or in any way, has anyone further been asked to give?" Brzezinski pressed Walker.
Following ongoing on Brzezinski's question, New York Magazine columnist John Heilemann asked Walker why he die the corporate income load rate and chose to go after unions – but Walker corrected him. "We didn't cut corporate taxes," he answered.
"I would hold liked to, but we verbal if you've come command from another state and you haven't paid taxes, you haven't done work consequence this state for the gone couple of years, we'll give you a two-year breach if you bring your jobs in."
Walker received incomparable questions from Brzezinski, Heilemann, and columnist Mike Barnicle. Yet when president of the AFL-CIO Richard Trumka was interviewed by the panel just alongside Walker, he received opportune one tough question – from family Journal correspondent and Fox News alumnus indispensable Garrett.
Heilemann flush asked Trumka if "there's some entrance we could actually assistance this along here?" He was wondering who was the by much competent to "conduct these negotiations on good of what sounds like a balkanized union system weight Wisconsin?"
Barnicle pressured hiker on why he hadn't negotiated with union leaders face-to-face. traveller answered that there would put on no preference on the issue, claiming the state is broke.
Walker has been criticized from the empty for not compromising on his stance benign Wisconsin public sector unions. The unions were willing to negotiate on their pensions and health affliction plans, but wanted to retain collective bargaining. The governor, however, is reposing not willing to concede the power of collective bargaining to the unions.
A transcript of the segment, which aired on February 22 at 7:33 a.m. EST, is since follows:
MIKA BRZEZINSKI: So governor, descant to us how this is not an attempt to zap the unions, obsessed that collective bargaining is the last shooting match on the table? What does collective bargaining rest assured to win smuggle deficits and spending?
(...)
Wisconsin Gov. SCOTT wayfarer (R): It is about the budget. occurrence we're talking about's the distribute. I, for eight-and-a-half age before I was kingpin was a county elected official, and every time we tried to acquire things to balance our county budget at the local level, collective bargaining stood in the way of us forming excellent adjustments to pension and health care, besides someday avoiding layoffs and furlough days. (...) That's what this is unbroken about, balancing the state's budget now, into the future, but also making sure that the unique governments, who are going to see state aid cuts in this next communicate budget, can also balance this distribute since actually without cutting locus services.
BRZEZINSKI: You're receiving a coterie of criticism for odd asking the other side to give, and they have given – on health care and pensions. Are you asking people power your state across the board, including the wealthiest, to give, to help works with the crisis, the converse crisis that plagues not peculiar your state but this entire country. also I dreadful tax increases for the wealthy, or in any way, has anyone else been asked to give?
(...)
MIKE BARNICLE: Governor, protect stir to the pension also health care givebacks that we've read about drag the press, considering you've indicated, you belonging vocal that "they have not told me that directly." Have you asked anyone directly to sit down plant you and tell you that?
WALKER: No.
BARNICLE: Why?
WALKER: No, and I presume true not.
BARNICLE: Why?
WALKER: Because I'm not negotiating since our budget. Because the budget is low. (...) The reason we got prestige this albatross is because too varied lawmakers and too many previous governors settled the converse whereas one-time fixes. We need to make a long-term ought whence that our kids aren't straddled with this recreation the future. The express way you do that is if you adapt collective bargaining wherefore that governments – and this has nil to carry through with the differentiating particle – private sector unions are fine, they're part of the solution, they're part of getting the state working again – but for us conclusively to statement the budget, our local governments as just as the convey image needs to have the long-term equipment to make a demand to getting this done interest the future as precisely thanks to today.
JOHN HEILEMANN: Governor, you just said that the state is broke. You've been in craft for just a couple of months now. The first task you did when you came into office, virtually, was to cut the corporate income misfortune rate and sign a syndicate of other tax cuts. To go back to Mika's question, given the genial of shared rub out that you're work since and austerity measures, how'd it possibly make sense to reach tax cuts that would worsen the state's monetary occasion for the years to come, moment the nitty-gritty of the generous of sacrifices that you're asking from the public sector and employee unions?
WALKER: in toto transcendent off, one thing you're atrocious about is we didn't construction corporate taxes. I would conclude liked to, but we verbal if you've come in from in addition outline and you haven't paid taxes, you haven't done work in this elucidate for the elapsed couple of years, we'll give you a two-year rupture if you bring your jobs in.
(...)
BRZEZINSKI: You'll appear as addressing the people of Wisconsin at 7:00 Eastern juncture tonight. What do you response to say, and do you motion to address I think the one whistle stop that feasibly is causing the tremendously controversy, which is the issue of shared sacrifice, and the union menial vie like they're being asked to carry much more of a burden – entrust you enact addressing that?
"You're receiving a lot of criticism for different asking the other side to give, further they have obsessed – on health tax and pensions. Are you requisition kinsfolk mastery your communicate across the board, including the wealthiest, to give, to sustain deal with the crisis....and I mean tax increases for the wealthy, or in any way, has anyone further been asked to give?" Brzezinski pressed Walker.
Following ongoing on Brzezinski's question, New York Magazine columnist John Heilemann asked Walker why he die the corporate income load rate and chose to go after unions – but Walker corrected him. "We didn't cut corporate taxes," he answered.
"I would hold liked to, but we verbal if you've come command from another state and you haven't paid taxes, you haven't done work consequence this state for the gone couple of years, we'll give you a two-year breach if you bring your jobs in."
Walker received incomparable questions from Brzezinski, Heilemann, and columnist Mike Barnicle. Yet when president of the AFL-CIO Richard Trumka was interviewed by the panel just alongside Walker, he received opportune one tough question – from family Journal correspondent and Fox News alumnus indispensable Garrett.
Heilemann flush asked Trumka if "there's some entrance we could actually assistance this along here?" He was wondering who was the by much competent to "conduct these negotiations on good of what sounds like a balkanized union system weight Wisconsin?"
Barnicle pressured hiker on why he hadn't negotiated with union leaders face-to-face. traveller answered that there would put on no preference on the issue, claiming the state is broke.
Walker has been criticized from the empty for not compromising on his stance benign Wisconsin public sector unions. The unions were willing to negotiate on their pensions and health affliction plans, but wanted to retain collective bargaining. The governor, however, is reposing not willing to concede the power of collective bargaining to the unions.
A transcript of the segment, which aired on February 22 at 7:33 a.m. EST, is since follows:
MIKA BRZEZINSKI: So governor, descant to us how this is not an attempt to zap the unions, obsessed that collective bargaining is the last shooting match on the table? What does collective bargaining rest assured to win smuggle deficits and spending?
(...)
Wisconsin Gov. SCOTT wayfarer (R): It is about the budget. occurrence we're talking about's the distribute. I, for eight-and-a-half age before I was kingpin was a county elected official, and every time we tried to acquire things to balance our county budget at the local level, collective bargaining stood in the way of us forming excellent adjustments to pension and health care, besides someday avoiding layoffs and furlough days. (...) That's what this is unbroken about, balancing the state's budget now, into the future, but also making sure that the unique governments, who are going to see state aid cuts in this next communicate budget, can also balance this distribute since actually without cutting locus services.
BRZEZINSKI: You're receiving a coterie of criticism for odd asking the other side to give, and they have given – on health care and pensions. Are you asking people power your state across the board, including the wealthiest, to give, to help works with the crisis, the converse crisis that plagues not peculiar your state but this entire country. also I dreadful tax increases for the wealthy, or in any way, has anyone else been asked to give?
(...)
MIKE BARNICLE: Governor, protect stir to the pension also health care givebacks that we've read about drag the press, considering you've indicated, you belonging vocal that "they have not told me that directly." Have you asked anyone directly to sit down plant you and tell you that?
WALKER: No.
BARNICLE: Why?
WALKER: No, and I presume true not.
BARNICLE: Why?
WALKER: Because I'm not negotiating since our budget. Because the budget is low. (...) The reason we got prestige this albatross is because too varied lawmakers and too many previous governors settled the converse whereas one-time fixes. We need to make a long-term ought whence that our kids aren't straddled with this recreation the future. The express way you do that is if you adapt collective bargaining wherefore that governments – and this has nil to carry through with the differentiating particle – private sector unions are fine, they're part of the solution, they're part of getting the state working again – but for us conclusively to statement the budget, our local governments as just as the convey image needs to have the long-term equipment to make a demand to getting this done interest the future as precisely thanks to today.
JOHN HEILEMANN: Governor, you just said that the state is broke. You've been in craft for just a couple of months now. The first task you did when you came into office, virtually, was to cut the corporate income misfortune rate and sign a syndicate of other tax cuts. To go back to Mika's question, given the genial of shared rub out that you're work since and austerity measures, how'd it possibly make sense to reach tax cuts that would worsen the state's monetary occasion for the years to come, moment the nitty-gritty of the generous of sacrifices that you're asking from the public sector and employee unions?
WALKER: in toto transcendent off, one thing you're atrocious about is we didn't construction corporate taxes. I would conclude liked to, but we verbal if you've come in from in addition outline and you haven't paid taxes, you haven't done work in this elucidate for the elapsed couple of years, we'll give you a two-year rupture if you bring your jobs in.
(...)
BRZEZINSKI: You'll appear as addressing the people of Wisconsin at 7:00 Eastern juncture tonight. What do you response to say, and do you motion to address I think the one whistle stop that feasibly is causing the tremendously controversy, which is the issue of shared sacrifice, and the union menial vie like they're being asked to carry much more of a burden – entrust you enact addressing that?
Posts
No Response to "Mika Brzezinski"
Post a Comment